Governance

Decision Quality

These scores are sample data, not measurements

The scoring pipeline is not built yet. What you see is illustrative: the dimensions and the shape of the readout are real, the numbers behind them were seeded with the prototype and were not derived from these cases. Nothing on this screen should be read as a measurement of how these decisions were actually made.

Decision signature

The shape of one decision across the eight dimensions, against the dashed organisation average. A dashed axis means that dimension cannot be measured yet.

7 sampled · sample average 67

Decision

PHX-DEC-000105 · overall 86 · weakest axis Stakeholder Integrity

Stakeholder Integrity

Were affected investors, employees, customers and partners fairly considered?

Reading

dimensionthisavg

Scores by decisionEvery dimension of every decision, sortable, with the below-threshold filter.7

Overall scorebelow

Decision
PHX-DEC-000102Strategic partner requesting a 40% stake and management control in Atlas PayJuly 28, 2026	92	84	90	88	80	72	65	—	71
PHX-DEC-000105Atlas Pay turnaround: additional capital or restructuringJune 28, 2026	88	90	85	82	78	90	84	92	86
PHX-DEC-000107The impact of Rocket Cargo's COO on team cultureJune 10, 2026	80	72	68	70	85	88	76	90	79
PHX-DEC-000108Establishing a group shared services centreJune 30, 2026	85	70	78	74	82	86	70	88	79
PHX-DEC-000101Justyol's entry into the Egyptian marketJuly 24, 2026	78	66	55	60	62	70	40	—	54
PHX-DEC-000103Rocket Cargo's unpaid €2.4M balance owed to JustyolJuly 22, 2026	70	74	35	45	68	55	30	—	47
PHX-DEC-000104Group CFO succession: internal or external candidateJuly 25, 2026	72	50	48	52	70	75	35	—	50

DC: Decision ClarityWere the problem, owner, deadline and desired outcome clearly defined?
EQ: Evidence QualityWere the material facts reliable, relevant and sufficiently current?
AQ: Alternative QualityWere credible alternatives and the do-nothing option assessed?
AV: Assumption VisibilityWere the critical assumptions explicit and testable?
SI: Stakeholder IntegrityWere affected investors, employees, customers and partners fairly considered?
AF: Authority–Accountability FitDid the person carrying the consequences hold matching decision rights and control?
ER: Execution ReadinessWere owners, resources, milestones, risks and damage control defined?
LC: Learning ClosureWas the actual outcome reviewed and turned into reusable knowledge?